Following post conviction convicted parties typically give a reactionary response when challenging the outcome of conviction. The typical element is usually found in the form of the human rights act whilst the reactionary element is led by the time sensitive nature of making an application for an appeal against conviction within 28 days of the conviction.
These factors can play a detrimental role in the decision making process of applicants seeking to make an appeal against conviction. another important factor for the applicant to take into account concerns a decision as whether to continue with any incumbent defense team. Understandably, a defense team which has been negligent in its handling of a case when representing the unfortunate convicted client will not readily admit to any negligence showing up as a disclosure in an application.
Thus convicted parties fail to act with care or any rationale of exploring other avenues before applying for an appeal against conviction which is meritorious.
Within the confines of statute book there exist other alternative solutions which can complement an appeal against conviction and thus serve to make an appeal robustly effective where the success of appeal against conviction is comparatively higher than norm.
The following is non exhaustive list of alternative complementary solutions which should be considered by applicants before making an appeal against conviction;
Devised by British Scientific Society Think Tank – Panzer Cybernetics Division